Clearly, one of your responsibilities as a manager is to create an
environment for everyone that’s safe and where they’re able to focus on getting
their work done. If someone’s dressing in a way that’s distracting to the rest of the
workforce it may be difficult for anyone to work as productively as they could.
You have a right, and indeed, an obligation as a manager to step in and make sure
that you create an environment that’s safe and productive for everyone.
But Isn’t That Harassment or Discrimination?
Many managers, especially male ones, are afraid to confront women about
their clothes, make-up or hair. While you may — if you’re in this situation — want to
consult with HR for some coaching before you approach this issue, you clearly
have a right to discuss this in a way that is not harassment.
What you can’t do is stereotype. Stereotyping
can be a subtle form of
discrimination and harassment. We all have some biases about one group or
another. Most stereotypes probably are unconscious; they may even be wellmeaning.
It is so common, in fact, that for years it was not recognized as the basis
for a discrimination lawsuit.
That changed in 1989, when the U.S. Supreme Court decided a case against
Price Waterhouse
. Ann Hopkins was one of 88 candidates for partnership in the
Big Eight accounting firm. She brought more business to the firm than any other
candidate. But she was not chosen for partner. The firm said she needed to “walk
more femininely, talk more femininely, dress more femininely, wear make-up,
have your hair styled, and wear jewelry.” The partners complained that she used
too much profanity “for a lady.” One said she needed “a course in charm school.”
The Supreme Court found that comments showed that stereotyped views of
women were being used as criteria for partnership. If the defendants had used
legitimate business standards, she would have made partner since she was an
excellent employee.
Men are also protected against discrimination or harassment based on
stereotypes about who is a “real man,” which can include comments or coaching
about dress or hair. In one case, a man for example, worked as a waiter in a
Mexican restaurant. He was heterosexual, but his supervisor and co-workers
barraged him with insults every day, calling him “her,” “girl,” “whore,” or saying
he “walked like a woman.” In ruling that the waiter could sue for sexual
harassment, the court relied on the Price Waterhouse case, finding that harassing a
man because he does not live up to a societal stereotype of virility is every bit as
illegal as discriminating against a woman who is perceived not to be “feminine”
enough.
The one exception to this kind of stereotyping is if you can show a strong
business-related need for make-up or certain clothes. Actors, singer, dancers and
other entertainers, cosmetologists, cosmetics salespeople, and beauticians might be
included.
For other jobs, dress, appearance and grooming codes are usually
permissible, even if they treat men and women differently. For instance, a may
impose different hair length requirements on men and women, and may require
men but not women to wear neckties. But, in California, a state law says employers
can’t make women wear skirts!
A “good grooming” standard for both sexes would be fine. But a dress or
appearance standard cannot impose substantially different
burdens on men and
women. So, a restaurant can require men and women to wear different uniforms,
but it cannot require only women to wear uniforms. An airline can require all flight
attendants to wear contact lenses, but not just women. In fact, a federal appeals
court recently ruled in favor of a class action by former United Airlines
stewardesses who had been fired for exceeding the weight tables. Women were
judged on having a medium frame; men were judged by weight tables based on a
large frame. Similarly, if you’re only counseling women and not men about their
grooming or professional appearance, there may be grounds for a claim of sex
discrimination.
You can have a dress or grooming standard that includes hiding such things
as tattoos, hickeys, or piercings, especially in public contact positions. Again,
make sure that you impose the same rules for both sexes.
Employees have tried to attack dress codes in all kinds of creative ways.
Employers have a lot of leeway in deciding what dress is appropriate for the
workplace. In one interesting case, a computer programmer was fired because he
wore Hawaiian shirts to work, instead of the business attire called for in the dress
code. He sued under the ADA, claiming that, because of a prior auto accident, he
could not wear a tie, and he had a doctor’s note supporting his need to wear shirts
that were loose around the clavicle. A federal appeals court affirmed the decision
to throw out his case without trial, finding that the inability to wear a tie was not a
disability!
General Rules for Talking About Dress or Grooming Issues
Before launching into a conversation with an employee that you believe has
dress or grooming issues, consider whether you can meet these general rules:
ï‚·
Have a dress and grooming code. It will be far easier to talk in the context of a
specific code, less likely to be viewed as discriminatory or as if they’re being
singled out in some way. If you don’t have one, work with HR or an
employment attorney to create one as a part of your employee manual.
ï‚·
Focus on performance. How does this particular dress or grooming issue impact
performance? If it doesn’t, STOP! You may be creating privacy, discrimination
or other issues. For example, does the dress or grooming issue create a
distraction for other employees or customers? Does the perfume or body odor
create triggers for other employees’ allergies? These are legitimate reasons to
require a different dress or grooming. You have a right and, indeed, an
obligation to try and create a productive workplace for everyone.
ï‚·
Seek coaching from HR or your employment attorney. These conversations can
be difficult. You need to role play with someone else first, if possible. Write out
what you plan to say. Be prepared, otherwise, it’s easy to get tongue tied on this
difficult topic.
ï‚·
Talk in private. These conversations can be very embarrassing to the employee
who frequently has no idea how they’re affecting other people. Make sure that
you give them the privacy they need and deserve.
ï‚·
Be specific. You need to tell them specifically what is wrong with what they’re
wearing or doing and what would make their situation comply with your policy.
If this were a person with good judgment, they wouldn’t be in this muddle so
don’t assume that they can guess what you mean and what you want without
some very specific suggestions from you.
ï‚·
Don’t beat around the bush. Get to the point and tell the truth fast.
ï‚·
Don’t stereotype or discriminate. Be careful if you’re counseling women but
not men. Be careful that you’re not requiring certain standards about masculine
or feminine unless you’re in the entertainment industry and can justify a
difference based on that.
ï‚·
As with any emotional issue, give the employee time to think about it and
respond. Listen so that you can hear opportunities for joint problem solving.
Copyright © 2009. No part of this material may be reproduced without written permission from Lynne Eisaguirre,
Workplaces That Work, 303-216-1020, Lynne@Workplacesthatwork.com
